“Turning to Jesus’ oral teaching, we must reckon with the fact that he used a method similar to that of Jewish—and Hellenistic—teachers: the scheme of text and interpretation. Kelly, Jerome, Duckworth, London 1975, pp.65, 223; J. Swedish Biblicist, Birger Gerhardsson, demonstrates the reliability of the sayings of Jesus as recorded in the Gospels from the teaching and memorisation methods of the Jewish rabbis and disciples at the time of Christ. L’origine et la date des évangiles, Éditions Saint-Paul, Paris 1994, pp.163-4 Resuscitò Cristo, Eparchia di Piana d. Codex Alexandrinus of the early 5th century contains almost all the New Testament. Other scholars point also to the wide use of shorthand and the carrying of notebooks in the Graeco-Roman world, the practice in schools of circulating lecture notes, and the common practice among the disciples of rabbis to make notes of their sayings. French scholar Jean Carmignac was struck by the Semitisms (Hebrew or Semitic way of writing and speaking) of the Greek text of St Mark’s Gospel when in 1963 he began to translate it into Hebrew. Evang., 1911; The Date of Acts and the Synoptic Gospels, Williams & Norgate, London, and Putnam, N. Theologische Quartalsch., Tübingen 1929, IV, pp.443-4 See a list of fifteen scholars in J. Codex Bezae of the 5th century contains, inter alia, the four Gospels. His work The Birth of the Synoptic Gospels summarises twenty years of research on the Hebrew language background to the Gospels. Wenham, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke, Hodder and Stoughton, London 1991, p.299. What first caught my attention was the very Hebraic word order of the Greek text of Mark. Usually I only needed to find the correct Hebrew equivalents to the Greek words in order to give good sense and understanding to the text. Author Work Date of writing Earliest complete copy Time span No. But the earliest dates are clearly more probable: Mark around 42; Completed Mark around 45; (Hebrew) Matthew around 50; (Greek) Luke a little after 50.” Based upon the same arguments, French philosopher and specialist in Hebrew thought Claude Tresmontant proposes the following dates: Matthew before 36, Mark 50-60, and Luke 40-60.
T., and another of the 4-5th century contains the four Gospels. books, dating from the 2nd-4th century, have been discovered in Egypt. From the early 3rd century we have: portions of 30 leaves with parts of the Gospels and Acts; a papyrus codex containing eight complete chapters of St Luke and five complete chapters of St John. He adduces multiple examples of Semitisms, and divides them into nine categories: Semitisms of borrowing, imitation, thought, vocabulary, syntax, style, composition, transmission, and translation. All manuscript statistics of the ancient classics are taken from the introductions to the critical editions of these texts published by Société d’Édition Les Belles Lettres, Paris. cit., p.328 The Gospel Tradition, Blackwell, Oxford 1970 R. Gundry, The Use of the Old Testament in St Matthew’s Gospel, Brill, Leiden 1967; E. Goodspeed, Matthew, Apostle and Evangelist, Winston, Philadelphia 1959; R. In 1935, a small fragment—four verses of St John’s Gospel, chapter 18—came to light; it is true to our text, and it is dated c. No one would ever have thought of questioning the integrity of the Gospel texts, but for the fact that they contain a Divine Law of belief and conduct, irksome to the irreligious. “In short, the latest dates that can be admitted are around 50 for Mark, … Whoever would dismiss the New Testament must logically reject all written sources of ancient history and literature. around 55 for Completed Mark; around 55-60 for Matthew; between 58 and 60 for Luke. In the 19th century it became standard for haughty Rationalists to scoff at Christianity and say that the Gospels were mere mythical stories, only loosely based on history, and not written until one hundred years or more after the original events.