Mandating nurse patient ratios

In addition, according to the, there are currently 14 states with laws/regulations regarding nurse staffing: California, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, and Washington [5].Of those, California is the only one that has Mandating specific nurse-to-patient staffing ratios allowed nurses in California to spend more time with their patients.Because the law allowed for 50% staffing by LVNs, however (purportedly because of the nursing shortage), there was concern that a lower skill mix could undermine the intent of the law.Now researchers seeking to determine the effect of the law on hospital staffing and skill mix (the ratio of RNs to total licensed nursing staff) have found that implementation of the mandated nurse staffing levels led to an in RN staffing in hospitals, not to a decrease as some had predicted. Yet, schedules and staffing plans need to be created, and day-to-day staffing holes need to be filled.Using nurse-to-patient ratios to cut through the complexity can seem like an easy solution.

what is validating data

A 1999 California law requiring the establishment of minimum nurse–patient staffing ratios in hospitals was intended to improve care and patient safety and to help hospitals retain nurses.After doing some initial searching, here is what I learned.Mc Hugh and colleagues partially answer this question within the previously mentioned article [1].Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without your express consent.

For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

In addition, procedural errors declined and patient outcomes improved since nurses were finally able to slow down and not rush patient care. Since hospitals in California were not able to meet the mandated nurse staffing ratios, they were required to hire more nurses.