Talk to sluts online
There is plenty of content about the topic of "slut", and a lot of sources do not identify that content as slut-shaming. If any of it gets added to the Slut-shaming article, it is likely only because editors have personally identified the material as slut-shaming, which is likely to be a WP: Synthesis violation.But the primary meaning is calling someone a slut, so really it's about slut-shaming, and then it's a content dupe of slut-shaming and the articles need to be merged. You can argue it different ways, but the point is that this article is completely unnecessary, since slut-shaming can take this whole article- and it doesn't look like 'slut' is going to amount to much.Yeah, if that's correct application of that policy, and all the other policies, then why is this article such a steaming pile of shit, and why does it have 100% overlap with a much better referenced article? Slut shaming seems to be fairly solid C-class, and could well go FA in the end, there's going to be enough feminist, academic and religious sources to balance it all out.In the 1800's, and indeed into the 1900's, well performed, and quality bitches (racing or producing Greyhounds), were called 'sluts'. If it was some amazing article, you might have a point, but actually it's a pile of crap.
Therefore, it is logical to presume that the term bitch, was strengthened as an insult by 'upgrading' the insult to 'slut'. In this article, if it's not only about slut-shaming, then it's on multiple meanings, in which case you need to split those meanings off into different articles.
Practice your sexting skills on our secure chat servers, or share sexy pictures to horny people right in your area!
Talk to sluts online comments