Validating professional development program

The AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.Training program evaluations can help the organization to reach many different goals during the life cycle of a training program.Agencies should use the model that more closely meets their needs.This logic model provides agencies with a systematic and visual aid to identify a training program’s components: inputs, outputs, outcomes and evaluation methodologies, and illustrates the relationship among them.

Training program evaluation examines the entire program including the training component, while training evaluation is assessment of the training course, process, or component within a program.An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluation. The Training Evaluation Field Guide uses the Kirkpatrick Model of evaluation as the basis of instruction.Agencies must track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal Register, The Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P. However, there are other viable, well researched and more appropriate models available to evaluate your training program, not just the training component of your program.In software project management, software testing, and software engineering, verification and validation (V&V) is the process of checking that a software system meets specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose.